Letters to the Editor: Faculty members continue to address the current climate on campus from all angles
Issue date: 4/23/08 Section: News Stories
Many of us on campus were deeply disturbed by the email from Mr. Paul Murano to the college community on April 2 in which he cited two Catholic bishops on voting on human life issues, while inviting people to attend a meeting of Assumption Advocates for Life. We were concerned about this email on several levels:
First, the email seemed like a call for political action rather than an invitation to intellectual exploration of complex moral and political issues. As such, it would seem to violate college policy on the use of campus-wide emails. In a message of some 180 words, we found three direct references to voting. If Mr. Murano wishes to speak with members of Advocates for Life about voting issues, he has every right to do so, but we do not believe he has the right to send a mass email to the entire campus advocating a political position.
Second, the message of the email seems to us profoundly inappropriate for a college campus. It is not an invitation to reflection and discussion, but an exhortation to believe and act on a particular ideology, one about which many Catholics in this country and elsewhere are deeply divided. The effect of its harsh language ("intrinsically evil;" "borders on scandal") was to close off discussion rather than to open it up. The memo seems less like calling people to a conversation about the relationship between faith and citizenship, than telling them what they should think. It is our sense that no one who did not already believe the views Mr. Murano cites would feel welcome to attend this meeting or explore the issues of the intersection between Catholic faith and American citizenship. Thus we do not believe the email was appropriate for a faculty member to send to the entire community.
Third, and perhaps most important, a statement that refers to gay marriage as "intrinsically evil" is provocative and inappropriate. It is deeply hurtful to our colleagues and friends who are gay or lesbian or who have family and friends who are gay and lesbian. Statements such as this can create an unsafe campus environment, inspiring disrespect and distrust on the part of some and concern for personal safety in others. As a community, we need to provide an atmosphere of caring support for all of our members. The memo does not fit with the behavior idealized by the college motto, "Until Christ be formed in you." The Biblical account of Christ encourages tolerance rather than condemnation. Indeed, the words of Christ in the Bible remind us that only those without sin can cast the first stone, and call us to feed the hungry and clothe the naked, not to condemn colleagues and friends.
First, the email seemed like a call for political action rather than an invitation to intellectual exploration of complex moral and political issues. As such, it would seem to violate college policy on the use of campus-wide emails. In a message of some 180 words, we found three direct references to voting. If Mr. Murano wishes to speak with members of Advocates for Life about voting issues, he has every right to do so, but we do not believe he has the right to send a mass email to the entire campus advocating a political position.
Second, the message of the email seems to us profoundly inappropriate for a college campus. It is not an invitation to reflection and discussion, but an exhortation to believe and act on a particular ideology, one about which many Catholics in this country and elsewhere are deeply divided. The effect of its harsh language ("intrinsically evil;" "borders on scandal") was to close off discussion rather than to open it up. The memo seems less like calling people to a conversation about the relationship between faith and citizenship, than telling them what they should think. It is our sense that no one who did not already believe the views Mr. Murano cites would feel welcome to attend this meeting or explore the issues of the intersection between Catholic faith and American citizenship. Thus we do not believe the email was appropriate for a faculty member to send to the entire community.
Third, and perhaps most important, a statement that refers to gay marriage as "intrinsically evil" is provocative and inappropriate. It is deeply hurtful to our colleagues and friends who are gay or lesbian or who have family and friends who are gay and lesbian. Statements such as this can create an unsafe campus environment, inspiring disrespect and distrust on the part of some and concern for personal safety in others. As a community, we need to provide an atmosphere of caring support for all of our members. The memo does not fit with the behavior idealized by the college motto, "Until Christ be formed in you." The Biblical account of Christ encourages tolerance rather than condemnation. Indeed, the words of Christ in the Bible remind us that only those without sin can cast the first stone, and call us to feed the hungry and clothe the naked, not to condemn colleagues and friends.

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 15
Paul Murano
posted 5/02/08 @ 3:02 PM EST
Where do I begin?
The amount of errors displayed in this article is very unfortunate, especially since it comes from those meant to be representing the Catholic intellectual tradition. (Continued…)
Jared
posted 5/03/08 @ 5:43 PM EST
Wow. Thank you Mr. Murano for thoroughly blasting the outright falsifications and thinly veiled accusatory remarks that had been printed in the "Letter to the Editor" to which you are responding. (Continued…)
James
posted 8/17/08 @ 9:35 PM EST
Mr. Murano,
While you are certainly a well-learned Theologian, you're inability to analyze something outside a single reference point is deeply disturbing for someone that is given money for being a teacher. (Continued…)
Paul Murano
posted 8/22/08 @ 2:36 AM EST
Dear James,
Thank you for your thoughts. I would agree with you that as a rule the word of God is not effective for those without faith. The Church has traditionally based her moral arguments not on the bible, but on natural law. (Continued…)
James
posted 8/25/08 @ 7:53 PM EST
Prof. Murano,
Perhaps you have not noticed that kleptomaniacs and the like have found happiness. The only thing that sets them apart from the other happy people is that their happiness is not a self-state of being; it's quite dysfunctional for society. (Continued…)
Paul M
posted 8/29/08 @ 7:42 PM EST
James,
Your last letter uncovered two things, which clarify why we see things differently:
1. You have a misunderstanding of natural law, and
2. (Continued…)
zombo
posted 1/06/09 @ 9:00 AM EST
solar power systems
generate electricity
home wind power
purchase movies
movie download sites
slot machines online
poker websites
blackjack strategy
blackjack online
beat roulette
Katrina Arkwright
posted 3/12/09 @ 12:02 PM EST
Thank you for writing the article, I am very pleased with how it came out.
Maria Ricard
posted 3/16/09 @ 4:21 AM EST
This sounds like a great program and a great way to improve education in our schools!
Wilma Walker
posted 3/19/09 @ 5:23 AM EST
Thanks to author! I like articles like this about , very interesting.
Post a Comment